NASA announces findings of ‘Earth’s bigger, older cousin’

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla.  — Scientists have identified the best bet yet for an Earth-like planet that might harbor life.

The researchers announced their discovery Thursday based on observations from NASA’s Kepler space telescope.

This “bigger, older cousin” to Earth is called Kepler-452b. What makes this planet remarkable is that it orbits its star at about the same distance that Earth orbits the sun. What’s more, its home star looks to be similar to our sun.

Scientists say it’s the closest thing we have to another Earth-sun twin system.

One unanswered question is whether the planet is rocky. Scientists say there’s a better than even chance it is.

The planet is in a solar system that is 1,400 light years from our own.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

3 comments

  • Joe Lodico

    First there has never been any planet like Earth found; if there was then NASA would state “we found life”. In fact Earth is the only known living planet; all other planets are considered dead – meaning without life.
    To say near-like Earth is also a false statement because it’s comparing dead planets to each other and not comparing them to Earth.
    This article is not evidence of Earth-like planets, The mass of those planets is different then Earth which has no bearing on likeness. Mass has gravity therefore too large or too small would force death to life as known. To state simply because of distance with millions of miles as an variable is ridiculous.
    Scientific evidence, the evidence which serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis. Such evidence is expected to be empirical evidence and interpretation in accordance with scientific method. There’s no evidence of other living planets so no can say there are other living planets. Anyone can state “maybe or could be” and of course that comment is not scientific evidence or proof at all of any living planet other then Earth.

    • The Dad Bod

      Yeah but you know Joe, some people like looking at artist renditions of “findings” and imagining; like children do.

    • Amy

      Joe, it is too early to determine the gravity of the planet. It is not yet know what is in the core of the planet. That determines what the gravity is on the planet more than mere size.