Special prosecutor says Daley did not try to influence Vanecko case

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Special prosecutor Dan Webb today released his report in the long-running case involving former Mayor Richard Daley’s nephew, Richard Vanecko, saying the mayor did not try to influence the case.

The report was made public at 9 a.m.

READ HERE: The Death of David Koschman – Report of the Special Prosecutor

Vanecko, 39, pled guilty Friday to involuntary manslaughter, for throwing the punch that ultimately killed David Koschman outside a tavern on Division Street in 2004.

He was was sentenced to 60 days in jail, followed by 60 days of home confinement and then 2 1/2 years of probation.


In his report, special prosecutor Webb concluded that former mayor Daley, his family and members of his administration did not try to influence the investigation into Koschman’s death.

The report stated that Daley told investigators he’d “made it clear to his staff and the public that because he was Vanecko’s uncle, he had recused himself from any involvement in the Koschman matter.”

But at a news conference held after the release of the report attorney Flint Taylor, one of the lawyers representing the Koschman family, told reporters:  “In this city, then and now, you don’t need a phone call, you don’t need a memo.  When it’s Daley, it’s ‘Holy crap, what do we do?'”

The special prosecutor said he found “limited evidence” of a possible effort by Chicago police commanders to “manufacture a phony self-defense” ruling in Koschman’s death when the case was re-investigated in 2011. The report cited evidence that last-minute corrections were made to a report that determined Koschman was the aggressor in the altercation.

“The earlier draft made no mention of self-defense, while the later draft concluded that Vanecko had acted in self-defense,” the report stated. The prosecutor also obtained emails in which Deputy Chief Dean Andrews and Sgt. Sam Cirone discussed “corrections” to the self-defense claim, according to the report.

“Under these circumstances, the public could well conclude that the entire claim of self-defense came not from Vanecko, but, rather, was conjured up in the minds of law enforcement,” said the conclusion of the report. “A discerning citizen could well surmise that it simply is an argument made of whole cloth. Whether Vanecko may, in fact, have a valid claim of self-defense should properly be for him to raise, not the police.”

The Chicago Tribune contributed to this report.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • kerryzaputz

    In his early days, Dan Webb reminded me of "young Mr Lincoln". Now he reminds me of young Mr Nixon. This is completely disgusting and a whitewash. After the pattern of obfuscation and obstruction displayed by the SAO, Webb writes down interviews from Anita Alvarez as gospel? That's credible. Was she under oath? The ethical public people in Chicago can be counted on one hand. The only person who looks moral and ethical in this case in my opinion is Judge Toomin. And Mrs. Koschman. I'm glad Mrs Koschman is happy with a simple apology from her son's killer. I am not so sanguine about this farce.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.