Bradley Manning could face decades in jail

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

Bradley Manning found not guilty of aiding the enemy

By Ben Brumfield and Barbara Starr, CNN

The sentencing hearing for Pfc. Bradley Manning begins Wednesday, and in the coming days, the famed leaker will find out how much time he will serve behind bars. It could be years or decades.

Judge Col. Denise Lind spared him the certainty of spending his entire life in jail Tuesday, when she acquitted him of the most grievous charge of aiding the enemy. Had she convicted him of that one charge, he could have spent life in prison without possibility of parole.

But Manning was found guilty of 20 other charges under the Espionage Act. Twelve of them carry maximum sentences of 10 years each in prison.

Altogether they add up to 136 years. But the judge may decide not to slap him with the maximum for each count. She may rule that he’ll serve time concurrently, rather than consecutively.

It may take several days before she reaches a decision.

Manning has already been in custody for three years.

Convictions and acquittal

Manning was convicted of stealing classified information and videos — more than 700 U.S. Southern Command records, records pertaining to Afghanistan, State Department cables and classified Army documents.

Then he leaked them for publication on the Internet.

Authorities say he delivered three-quarters of a million pages of classified documents to the secret-sharing site WikiLeaks, which has never confirmed the soldier was the source of its information.

The military accused him of putting lives in danger, saying some of the material was found in Osama bin Laden’s compound.

The judge, Col. Denise Lind, in acquitting Manning of the main charge, said that he didn’t know al Qaeda would get the material and therefore did not aid the enemy.

Free speech

Manning said he just wanted the public to know what the government was doing.

Wikileaks supported his claim in a statement on Tuesday blasting the convictions on the other counts as “a dangerous precedent and an example of national security extremism.”

“It can never be that conveying true information to the public is ‘espionage.'”

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange plans to speak live on the Internet Wednesday on the verdict, according to a Tweet from Wikileaks confirmed feed.

Civil rights organizations also came out in support of Manning as a hero of free speech.

“The only reason why the government decided to proceed with this trial is so that it could pursue this dangerous theory that equates leaks to the press with aiding the enemy,” said ACLU spokesman Ben Winzer.

Others saw the acquittal on the main charge as a victory for free speech.

“It shows that a really very junior enlisted person can do battle with the federal government in a case where the government is really mad as hell about what happened here, throws everything it has at him, and its biggest charge fizzles,” said Gene Fidell from the National Institute of Military Justice.

Citizen journalist

During Manning’s sentencing hearing, Congress will convene a hearing on future of the National Security Agency’s surveillance programs in the wake of a second major intelligence leak: Edward Snowden’s leaks of records to journalist Glenn Greenwald.

Greenwald, who writes for the British daily newspaper The Guardian, believes Manning’s convictions is evidence of differential justice, he told CNN’s Anderson Cooper Tuesday.

He said the soldier was just doing the job journalists should do to make government transparent to the American people.

Greenwald compared Manning with famed journalist Bob Woodward, who gained international fame, when he broke the iconic Watergate wiretapping scandal. Its cover up led to the resignation of then Republican President Richard Nixon.

“Bob Woodward has written book after book after book and has become extremely rich by publishing secrets way more sensitive than anything Bradley Manning ever published,” Greewald said.

The difference in the eyes of U.S. justice, in Greenwald’s opinion: Woodward is well connected with senior officials who leak to him.

Manning, he said, is not.

Opinion: Unfair verdict on Manning

CNN’s Barbara Starr wrote and reported from Washington; Ben Brumfield wrote and reported from Atlanta; CNN’s Chelsea J. Carter, Ashley Fantz and Larry Shaughnessy contributed to this report

  TM & © 2013 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s