IL lawmakers back in Springfield for special session on pensions

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

In a step toward patching Illinois’ pension deficit, state lawmakers created a conference committee today that will try to deal with the financial mess.

For the Democrats: Senators Dan Biss, Linda Holmes, Kwame Raoul and  Representatives Elaine Nekritz, Arthur Turner, and Mike Zalewski.

For the GOP: Senators Bill Brady, and Matt Murphy and Representatives Darlene Senger and Jil Tracy.

Governor Pat Quinn was unable to secure enough votes in the Senate to pass a House pension plan backed by both Quinn and House Speaker Michael Madigan.

Lawmakers have been trying to fix the state`s colossal pension plan which is growing like Jack`s Beanstalk. Unable to reach a consensus for the past two years, they now say they are closer than ever to working out the details on a patchwork plan that would not exactly fix the problem, but would at least stop the bleeding long enough for a real cure to be found.

Lawmakers in Springfield have been called back into session because they know pension reform is critically needed so the state can meet its financial obligations. But drawing up new pension guidelines is tricky because any redesigned measures have to meet constitutional rules, or the courts will kick them back.

Currently the debt is just over $100 billion.  With $100 billion you could buy Boeing Aircraft Company and Kraft Foods, two giants of industry, and still have a lot of money left over.

The interest on the debt is calculated to be growing $1 milllion a day.  At that rate the debt will soon be so large that it could never be paid off and the state would have to default.

That kind of crushing debt has caused Wall Street to lower the state`s bond rating from AAA to AA to A and now A-.  That low rating costs the state more money and higher interest rates to borrow funds to do business.

It is hoped that lawmakers will be able to decide on two competing proposals — one by Senate President John Cullerton or the other by House Speaker Michael Madigan — or a combined version of the two.

That is what lawmakers are there to do at a cost of $40,000 a day.

Republicans have also offered a plan that they say will fix the problem. But without sufficient votes in Springfield, no matter how good the plan is, it does not stand a chance of passing.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


  • tina guglielmi

    Im so tired of hearing about how the pension debt is killing Illinois economy! My husband has worked for the state for 30 years. He paid his dues, the state workers didn’t spend that money! The politicians of Illinois spent their pension money. They have been robbed! And now the workers are to take the brunt of this? Why can’t anyone report it from the state workers perspective? it always sounds like its the workers fault. I can tell you from experience that cuts are never made at the top. They cutall the regular workers. Management continues to get raises, they don’t take furlough days and many if them do nothing all day. Thanks for letting me vent. It would be nice to report on this issue from the working man’s perspective.

  • Dennis

    Everyone agrees Illinois teacher pension plans were not funded by the legislature as specified. Now our elected representatives are desperate to solve the problem created by that lack of funding. Unfortunately, their proposals would result in the retirees bearing the financial burden to correct the problems our politicians created.

    These retirees had no choice on making their annual contributions to the retirement funds since the money came right off the top of their earnings. Since every resident of the state was involved in electing those representatives who chose to underfund the plans, I suggest the problem needs to be solved by involving every resident of the state, not just teachers.

    I would be glad to pay an increased state sales tax if the additional tax raised was put in the retirement funds in addition to what is supposed to be put in each year going forward. This would put the burden on everyone and would not diminish the pensions that have been constitutionally guaranteed.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.