Obama talks about gun violence during Chicago visit

This is an archived article and the information in the article may be outdated. Please look at the time stamp on the story to see when it was last updated.

President Barack Obama said Friday that children from communities wracked by poverty and violence need help from the government, schools, family and clergy to have a chance to climb “ladders of opportunity” to reach the middle class and beyond.

Speaking at a Chicago high school near where he used to live, Obama cited gun violence that killed 443 people in the city last year as one reason why children need community wide support to help them believe they can improve their lives through education and hard work.

“In too many neighborhoods today, whether here in Chicago or the farthest reaches of rural America, it can feel like, for a lot of young people, the future only extends to the next street corner or the outskirts of town,” he said, adding “that no matter how much you work or how hard you try, your destiny was determined the moment you were born.”

He emphasized proposals from his State of the Union address this week, such as raising the minimum wage to $9 an hour and providing good pre-schooling for every child as necessary to help people better themselves.

Obama also called for Congress to vote on a package of gun proposals aimed at decreasing shootings on the streets, in homes, at schools and in shopping malls and places of worship.

“This is not just a gun issue,” he continued. “It’s also an issue of the kinds of communities that we’re building, and for that we all share responsibility as citizens to fix it.”

It all starts at home, the president said, calling “strong, stable families” and “loving, supportive parents” the most important ingredients for reducing violence.

Noting he was raised by a single mother, he called for promoting marriage and encouraging fatherhood, saying he wished he had a father around and involved when he was a boy.

“By the way, that’s all kinds of parents,” he added. “That includes foster parents, and that includes grandparents, and extended families. It includes gay or straight parents.”

Obama headed to his hometown after a White House ceremony to award the Presidential Citizens Medal — the nation’s second-highest civilian honor — to 18 people. They included posthumous honors for six educators killed along with 20 first-graders in December’s Connecticut school massacre.

He hugged family members of the slain teachers and administrators from Sandy Hook Elementary School in presenting the medals, saying: “We could not be more grateful to your loved ones, who gave everything they had” for the children in their care.

In his remarks at Hyde Park Academy High School, Obama mentioned Hadiya Pendleton, 15, who was killed by gunfire in Chicago last month after returning from taking part in inaugural activities in Washington.

Pendleton’s parents were in the crowd, just as they were at the State of the Union as guests of first lady Michelle Obama, who attended Hadiya’s funeral.

The president called for Congress to act on his package of gun measures, saying the proposals intended to save young lives “deserve a vote.”

Fierce opposition by the National Rifle Association makes passage of any significant gun legislation uncertain. In response to Obama’s State of the Union address, the NRA has sought to discredit the motives and impacts of legislation proposed by the president and Democrats.

“They only care about their decades-old gun control agenda — ban every gun they can, tax every gun sold and register every gun owner,” NRA chief executive Wayne LaPierre said in a statement on Thursday. “This president has taken the art of public deception and manipulation to a whole new level.”

Obama seeks an updated version of the 1994 assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004, that would prevent the manufacture and sale of some semi-automatic rifles modeled after fully automatic assault weapons.

He also proposes limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds, expanding background checks to all gun transactions, including sales at gun shows. He also wants Congress to take steps to better screen people with mental illnesses, so they cannot obtain weapons.

Legislation proposed so far also would crack down on so-called straw purchases, in which a legal buyer purchases weapons for distribution to non-legal buyers.

The NRA and other opponents argue the Democratic proposals are veiled attempts to limit gun ownership and eventually take away weapons, and therefore violate the constitutional right to bear arms.

In particular, opponents contend the proposed ban on semi-automatic rifles focuses on a weapon used in a tiny percentage of killings and other gun violence.

Harold Pollack, co-director of the University of Chicago Crime Lab, confirmed on Friday that so-called assault weapons targeted by the proposed ban account for a small fraction of murders in the United States.

However, Pollack said the ban proposed by Obama can help reduce gun violence, especially what he called the psychologically impactful mass shootings such as the Newtown attack in which a lone gunman used a Bushmaster semi-automatic rifle.

The combination of such weapons with high-capacity magazines “facilitates mass homicides,” Pollack told CNN, noting that professional criminals generally don’t use such rifles that look like military weapons.

“The people who do use these weapons are often the most dangerous or most sociopathic,” Pollack said. The Newtown shooter, a 20-year-old man living with his mother, took her legally owned guns and killed her before going to the school to open fire on students and teachers.

To Pollack, such a mass killing — while relatively rare — “traumatizes communities and the entire society in a way that demands attention.”

To the NRA, that attention should be putting armed guards at every school, rather than seeking to limit the ability of people to obtain weapons. It also calls for tougher enforcement of existing gun laws, which Pollack agreed was necessary.

“A lot of the underground gun market could be stopped if we treated guns with the same amount of determination and tools as the drug market,” he said.

For example, Pollack noted how committing a crime with a gun brought additional charges, and he called for similar treatment for illegally possessing a firearm.

In a Google Hangout online chat on Thursday, a participant asked Obama how renewing the assault weapons ban would help reduce gun violence caused primarily by handguns.

He responded that his proposed package would affect handgun violence through the expanded background checks and cracking down on straw purchases. Renewing the weapons ban focused on what Obama called “weapons of war.”

“It’s not going to solve every problem,” the president continued, noting that some restrictions are already in place.

“We can’t purchase a grenade launcher from a store, although there may be some folks who want to buy those,” he said. “And the reason is we think on balance, the Second Amendment does not automatically assume that any weapon that’s available you can automatically purchase.”

TM & © 2013 Cable News Network, Inc., a Time Warner Company. All rights reserved.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


    • bob

      I agree with you Lloyd. All Bush did was start a war that had our soldiers looking for "Weapons of Mass Destruction" and we never found them. Meanwhile, it brought our country to financial ruin and many of our men and women in uniform died in the process. Further, a lot of people nowadays can't seem to put two and two together and they just blame Obama for all of that. I am guessing for the most part because he's black and that's what racist people with little education do. I guess, for them, it is better to blame than thinking. What a bunch of idiots.

      • Tony C.

        You are drinking the Kool-Aid! 11,000,000 illegal immigrants, overspending and increasing government, extended unemployment and entitlements, along with corruption in mostly cities where residents voted for Obamam are what are causing the shortfalls. The wars were on a different dime and were only a drop in the bucket compared to overall waste. This did not happen on Bush's watch. Obama had a term plus to clean up any crap from the past. Other presidents have succeeded in one term and by the way had a plan that did not keep blaming other administrations.

      • Llyod Christmas

        Totally disagree with you Tony C. but Obama already won the election so I guess there's not much you can do but try to appeal other complainers on news blogs. Hey, good luck to your candidate in 2016, but that sure is a long time away. Geez, I hope you're not too old when that comes around. Anyway, try to enjoy life in the meantime.

  • (=*=)

    (=*=) I feel what our President did for Chicago was good but it's not great. What we need is for him to go out into these streets, approach these gang members on the streets, and talk to them about their gang activities that are affecting our city and nation. Our President is from these streets and he needs to act like it by talking directly to the streets. It means more and will clearly show him on the front lines fighting to reducing violence. (=*=) INTELLIGENCE

  • Jose

    Pollack shouldn't even be a politician. “The people who do use these weapons are often the most dangerous or most sociopathic,”; Are you kidding me? You're saying that our police and sport shooters are dangerous? Pollack claims mass shootings “traumatizes communities and the entire society in a way that demands attention." Oh OK, but 505 murders in one city, while still over the course of a year, is not as important. The president states that the "Second Amendment does not automatically assume that any weapon that’s available you can automatically purchase.” So then, according to his statement, what stops him from banning other guns? Since, the Second Amendment doesn't guarantee us any specific firearms; Thought the origin of this Amendment is that we could be equally armed as our forces (in case of tyranny or neglect towards the citizens), which we already aren't, and now they want to punish the law abiding citizens by banning these firearms that are the closest thing to our forces arms. Guns aren't the problem, which is quite clear for those who would like to realize it, but the real problem is finding out how we get such violent, and evil individuals who cause these acts, not criminals(because they cause violence because of their personal needs through illegal acts and there will always be criminals), and solving it.

Notice: you are using an outdated browser. Microsoft does not recommend using IE as your default browser. Some features on this website, like video and images, might not work properly. For the best experience, please upgrade your browser.